Authors:
Melissa Andrews, PhD | Research Associate II, In Vivo Operations
Sarah Clark, DVM, DACLAM | Attending Veterinarian, Animal Welfare and Veterinary Services
Justin Snider | Senior Scientist, Scientific Development
Ashley Weiser | EHS Manager, Environmental Health & Safety
Date: August 2022
Viruses and bacteria have a bad reputation. As we continue to deal with a global pandemic caused by a virus, there is heightened awareness to the potential negative impact of viruses. However, it is also true that both viruses and bacteria are powerful tools in treating many diseases. Their ability to infect quickly, along with their rapid dividing potential, also makes them a great asset to the research community. Since the early 20th century, viruses, bacteria and other biosafety level 2 (BSL2) materials have been recognized as potential treatments for various cancers. More concerted efforts have been put forth in recent years to research these materials. There are currently two BSL2 materials approved by the FDA for use: T-VEC (Imlygic®), an oncolytic virus (OV) therapy against advanced melanoma, and bacillus Calmette-Guérin, a bacterial therapy against non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
BSL2 materials differ from more traditional cancer therapies due to the moderate risk they pose to humans and/or animals as infectious agents or toxins.1 Due to the nature of some BSL2 materials, an animal biosafety level 2 (ABSL2) suite is practically preferable to perform in vivo work within a vivarium. ABSL2 suites allow for containment and separation of animals, materials and staff from the general vivarium and animal populations to contain the potentially infectious material. BSL2 material can be used as a monotherapy or in a combination therapy approach. As a monotherapy, an OV can replicate and kill cancer cells, without harming normal tissue.2 In a combination approach, OVs have allowed for local delivery of multiple immunomodulators to the tumor environment, even crossing the blood-brain barrier, which has been shown to decrease non-target toxicity.3 OVs have also been combined with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell therapy in solid tumors to make the tumor microenvironment more suitable for T-cell infiltration.4
The preclinical oncology (PCO) team at Labcorp Drug Development strives to stay current on modern technologies and collaborates with clients to optimize our service offerings and advance research opportunities. Considering the renewed interest in BSL2 materials, PCO has recently renovated and expanded our ABSL2 suites at both the Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Greenfield, Indiana, sites. We believe that our PCO expertise, our vast experience in the use of checkpoint inhibitors, cell therapies and BSL2 materials and our revamped ABSL2 suites place us in a great position to serve our clients in their exploration to find an effective and novel treatment in either a non-GLP or GLP setting (Table 1).
Both PCO sites have experience working with several modified BSL2 viral and bacterial vectors and have entered discussions to perform studies with additional materials (Table 2). These materials have been administered via traditional dosing routes but also via direct intracranial injections and intratumoral injections. We have vast surgical experience that allows us to implant cancer cells or tumor fragments orthotopically or inject BSL2 materials into specific tissues. If in vivo or ex vivo imaging is of interest, our in vivo imaging system (IVIS) bioluminescence imaging (BLI) systems allow us to monitor and track cancer cell lines transduced with luciferase for disease progression or track fluorescent-tagged BSL2 materials for biodistribution evaluation. We also have the capability to assess disease burden with digital caliper measurements. We offer a number of other in vivo and in vitro services to aid our clients in their pursuit of further developing anti-cancer BSL2 materials (Table 3).
Our employees and animals are of utmost importance to us, which led us to our policy that any biological component that may pose a risk to the health of our employees and animals or the vivarium environment requires review by the site’s biosafety committee. This allows us to prevent exposure and appropriately identify containment level and handling procedures. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Institutes of Health’s “Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories” (BMBL, 6th Edition) is referenced for best practices.5 The BMBL is only a guiding document and other resources will be referenced as needed. All animal work is reviewed and approved by the site’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee or Animal Welfare Ethical Review Board. Both PCO sites meet or exceed local animal welfare regulations and have their programs accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC). The minimum information the biosafety committee requests to assess risk is a draft study design, the type of agent and any associated agent documents. The biosafety committee also evaluates risks of splash, laceration/needle stick and aerosols either from formulation, dosing or indirectly from animal bedding to determine the need for engineering controls in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s Bloodborne Pathogens Standard as well as the general duty clause for ensuring safety of our employees. We protect our staff, animals and vivarium via controls that include, but are not limited to, separate ABSL2 HVAC units, biosafety cabinets, disinfectants, personal protective equipment and other mitigation efforts to ensure employees are safe from hazards. If an agent requires vaccination prior to handling, the committee will communicate and offer vaccines to staff as needed.
Table 1 – Number of Different Study Types Performed at Labcorp PCO
Studies Performed at Labcorp PCO |
|
Study Type |
Number of Studies Run at PCO |
CAR T or CAR NK studies |
425+ |
Studies with ABSL2 agents |
75+ |
BLI studies |
650+ |
Checkpoint inhibitor studies |
300+ |
Biologic test article studies |
1200+ |
Small molecule test article studies |
1900+ |
Combination studies |
1100+ |
GLP and non-GLP studies |
4100+ |
Table 2 – Different BSL2 Materials Used or Discussed by Labcorp PCO
BSL2 Test Materials |
|
Adenovirus constructs |
Bacteriophages |
Herpes simplex virus constructs |
Lentiviral constructs |
Vaccinia virus constructs |
Lymphocytic choriomeningitis (LCMV) constructs |
Escherichia coli constructs |
|
Salmonella Typhi constructs |
|
Salmonella Typhimurium constructs |
|
Table 3 – Labcorp ABSL2 Capacity and Capabilities Overview
ABSL2 Capacity and Capabilities |
|
In Vivo Capacity and Capabilities |
In Vitro Capabilities |
|
|
Additional Information on Capabilities |
|
• BLI |
|
• CAR T-cell persistence analysis via flow cytometry: |
|
• ELISpot and FluoroSpot analysis: |
Contact the preclinical oncology scientific team to learn more.
References
1. Science Safety Security. Biosafety level requirements. September 25, 2019. https://www.phe.gov/s3/BioriskManagement/biocontainment/Pages/BSL-Requirements.aspx.
2. Chiocca EA, Rabkin SD. Oncolytic viruses and their application to cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(4):295-300. doi:10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0015.
3. Haddad AF, Young JS, Aghi MK. Using viral vectors to deliver local immunotherapy to glioblastoma. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;50(2):E4. doi:10.3171/2020.11.FOCUS20859.
4. Taylor NP. Bluebird, PsiOxus show oncolytic virus boosts CAR-T in solid tumors. Fierce Biotech. April 14, 2021. https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/bluebird-psioxus-show-oncolytic-virus-boosts-car-t-solid-tumors.
5. Centers for Disease Control; National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 6th Edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/labs/pdf/SF__19_308133-A_BMBL6_00-BOOK-WEB-final-3.pdf.
Connect
Let's start a conversation
Contact Us